Is there any use IYO for the smith machine?

Englishmustard

Bollocks!
Trusted Member
So as you might know, I joined planet fitness, for cardio mainly. I went to join this other gym in town too but found out that they are in the process of moving and stopped there “gym only” memberships. (It’s also a dance studio/bouncy trampoline jump fitness thing) I’m trying to save money for school in April so do not want to go back to paying $94 a month. So I feel I’m stuck with PF for the next three months then I can hit the college gym for two months for free. So anyway. I can’t use any barbells as PF does not have them :(
I tried using the smith machine for shrugs and rows. Didn’t seem too bad.
I know that you shouldn’t use it for squats cos of the whole locked range of motion thing but do you think it’s worth using when you have no alternative? Anything else you do use one for?
 
I’ve used smith machines for bench press, shoulder press and drag curls. Never done squats with one, but without alternatives it’s still effective in my opinion....probably try a front squat with a smith machine and see how that feels
 
I’ve used smith machines for bench press, shoulder press and drag curls. Never done squats with one, but without alternatives it’s still effective in my opinion....probably try a front squat with a smith machine and see how that feels
Ah yeah I never thought of trying front squats with it. Thanks.
 
I love the smith for shoulder press (take it down deep elbows in) and shrugs (standing in front of the bar). Having said that at some point in my years of training I probably tried just about everything possible on a smith and everything I tried ranged from ok to awesome. I think you'll be just fine @Englishmustard.
 
You can even use it to hang your towel.

I’ve never really used a smith much but than I’ve never had to. But if I was in your situation I’d make it work. Before stacking on the weight find your range of motion first, you’ll know if it’s off a bit after a couple reps than just make some adjustments being feet positioning or bench alignment and start throwing on the plates.

Smith machines are a terrible choice for novices but work just fine for the experienced.
 
I've used them at one point or another for every body part. They have their use in any routine that desires diversity. I find it best when trying to develop strength. You don't need a spot and you don't use stabilizing muscles. You can just focus on the movement and moving weight.

You wouldn't design a program based on them... but thrown in here and there... they are valuable.

And they certainly have come in handy when dealing with injuries too.
 
If their smith machine has a bit of an angle to it like some do, just try different positions.

It will work for everything.

Be inventive, you may need to up your intensity,by lowering rest time, or drop sets.
 
I used to LOVE using a Flex Fitness smith machine front front presses for shoulders! I've had a few opportunities to buy a good quality smith machine (basically any one other than Life Fitness!) but I just don't have the room!
 
I use it for incline + decline sets, and if I feel really brutal I throw on a volume based flat bench with those.

I love standing shoulder presses with it.

As for squats, after I broke my neck I was never able to load up a standard bar and squat, I was however able to do Smith squats successfully.
 
I use it for inclines and flat due to my rotators being weaker than chest/back/delts .... I love the fact that it moves in a plane as opposed to an arc.... I find I can focus more on the feel than having to worry about moving the weight alone.
Front squats work , for "regular" squats, it becomes more of a sit-squat as your legs have to be a little more out front than on a free bar squat
 
Thanks for the replies and suggestions. I’m gonna be stuck with PF for at least three months. I’m on PCT right now so I kinda feel like I’m just trying to maintain.
I tried regular back squats with the Smith. I looked at the angle the bar slopes back and could not figure out how I’d make front squats work. @Boomer is right about the sitting thing. My feet were almost further forward than my shoulders. I did not like the feel of it and my lower back got more sore than usual and quicker. I guess I’ll have to play around a bit more.
 
Thanks for the replies and suggestions. I’m gonna be stuck with PF for at least three months. I’m on PCT right now so I kinda feel like I’m just trying to maintain.
I tried regular back squats with the Smith. I looked at the angle the bar slopes back and could not figure out how I’d make front squats work. @Boomer is right about the sitting thing. My feet were almost further forward than my shoulders. I did not like the feel of it and my lower back got more sore than usual and quicker. I guess I’ll have to play around a bit more.

Most of the argument against machines is usually based around the (1)unnatural movements that machines lock you into and (2)the lack of activity in the "stabilizing muscles" that free weights would stimulate if balance was required. The locked in "problem" will come with any movement done on a machine and I don't think it's that big of a deal when intelligently incorporated into a well thought out program that incorporates free movement. To me it can be used to your advantage sometimes.

Now the second problem is much bigger. Proprioception loosely defined is the sense of where your body is in space. You get that sense along with equilibrium, balance and spacial awareness from a combination of a bunch of things, things like the sensors in your inner ears, visual input, tactile signals (what you are touching) and more specifically to Proprioception - from Proprioceptors which are receptors/sensors in your muscles and tendons. All that shit sends signals to your brain to interpret at approximately a zillion times per second.

When you are locked into a piece of equipment with a substantial portion of your body having contact with the machine this becomes less important because a so much larger part of that feedback becomes fairly constant. Bench, Leg Press, extensions, that cool preacher curl machine you love so much etc.

On the other hand for athletic (cause the word functional picks me sometimes) motion this stuff is most important when you are somewhat upright and requiring some balance with the importance being amplified if you are on your feet and those systems are seeing constant change and adjusting. So Skwatz, deads, standing OHP etc.

So what you loose by doing those on your feet exercises on a machine is not just the appropriate activation of those stabilizing muscles which are so important to prevent muscular imbalances and maximize efficiency. You are also messing up the whole Proprioception feed back system because you are essentially sending it some inaccurate sort of non reality based bullshit to figure out - in essence you are training your body to do it wrong. Then you get in a real life situation like lifting a heavy box above your head, throwing a check, jumping down off your bunkbed or popping up off the couch when the pizza guy rings and you pull a hammy or fuck up your lower back cause your shit is out of wack jack. And it might be really hard to notice any of these drawbacks until you get hurt.

I've noticed that in the last few (?) years most of the new Smith machines at those types of foofy gyms have that angled bar path. I grudgingly will admit that there may be some advantages to that in some specific movements but generally it pisses me off. WTF was wrong with a perpendicular line of travel? It's natural, gravity pulls shit straight down. Your body can understand that better.

Bottom line TLDR- A few months of it won't mess you up too bad because you already have thousands of "real" reps in just make sure you include a healthy dose of natural movements in your life whether that be in the gym or outside of it.

Edit - 'I'm on PCT so I'm just trying to maintain' Nothing personal and I know that's not exactly what you said but Fuck that shit! That's one of the most common sins of the Juicehead imo, such a waste...
 
Last edited:
I detest those angled smiths.

Just a guess but I think they are trying to simulate a bench press bar path. They may have come close to getting the starting and finishing points in the right places but the natural path from A to B for bench is not a straight line, for the majority people a proper path is somewhat serpentine. Those ones that are not solidly attached look pretty slick though, allows travel on both planes, probably cost a bundle too.

Here is a pic of one, cheaper than I thought but Australia....

https://dynamofitness.com.au/reeplex-raptor-3d-smith-machine
 
Top