Interested in brewing a blend of dhb(75-100)and test e(150-200)
DHB blend
- Thread starter Buildingbetterbodies
- Start date
A lot less difficult than you’d think dhb just needs heat low and real slow and let it stir away with the magnetic stir 2ba16BB mct oil I think with the test E it might even take better. I’ll update in a few weeks
People push the bb too high and it actually throws the solvent balance off
It will most likely bite incredibly bad.
I’ve been doing some research a lot of people over do the bb on dhb and don’t heat it long enough also by adding in some test e so I’m going to spend some time working on it if I come up with something worth sharing I’ll post it here.
1A) What you’re noticing with adding Test E to a DHB (dihydrobenzyltestosterone) homebrew comes down to a few chemistry and pharmacology points:
- Solubility and ester balance:
DHB can be a tricky compound to dissolve fully, especially at higher concentrations. Adding Test E (testosterone enanthate) increases the overall oil and ester content in the solution, which can help stabilize DHB crystals or prevent precipitation. It basically acts as a “carrier” that keeps the DHB more uniformly suspended. - Viscosity and injectability:
Test E in oil is a heavier, well-dissolved ester. Blending it in can smooth out the solution, making it less harsh when drawing into a syringe and injecting. It reduces the likelihood of DHB clumping or causing a gritty injection. - Injection site comfort:
A DHB-only brew, especially if it’s high concentration, can sting or irritate tissue. Test E’s oiliness dilutes it a bit and increases absorption tolerance, leading to less burning and a “better” experience.
Those are some interesting statements.
if you always do what you’ve always done you’ll always be where you already been
Last edited:
Why more BB doesn’t always help with DHB
1. The idea
Benzyl benzoate (BB) helps dissolve compounds.
More BB = stronger solvent (to a point)
2. The problem with Dihydroboldenone (DHB)
3. Why too much BB causes crashing
Like sugar in hot water:
5. Bottom line
1. The idea
Benzyl benzoate (BB) helps dissolve compounds.
More BB = stronger solvent (to a point)
2. The problem with Dihydroboldenone (DHB)
- Dissolves easily when hot
- Crashes easily when it cools
3. Why too much BB causes crashing
- Too much BB (like ~20%)
- Forces DHB into solution when hot
- But creates an unstable mix
- → Crashes later
- Moderate BB (12–16%)
- Slightly less dissolving power
- But much more stable long-term
Like sugar in hot water:
- Hot = everything dissolves
- Cool = extra crashes out
5. Bottom line
- DHB needs balance, not max solvent strength
- More BB ≠ more stable
- Sweet spot = enough to dissolve, not so much it destabilizes
A friend of mine experienced with dhb 100 a few years ago different brews. Some of them hurt but after a few approaches he found some mix’s that were more than tolerable I wasn’t into brewing at the time so i don’t ask but I’m going to play around and figure it out it’s too good of a compound to be left at the back of the shelf and at 50mg/ml that’s where it will stay
You are wildly incorrect in basically all of what you are posting here in this thread.
And this has nothing to do about spit balling ideas in the name of thinking unconventionally to be better by challenging accepted norms to evole ideas. See above. You should have left your initial response up so all could see so they better understand my comments.
In this case....You just dont know what you are talking about, yet are suggesting that you do. There is a distinct difference between these two scenarios.
As such, the conversation does not lend itself to idea sharing in the name of building community and discussion.
from what I’ve seen when you post it’s you posting what you believe as fact and disregarding anything else. Just because you don’t know better doesn’t mean it’s not true it just means that you aren’t fully informed about it. I do t remember the last time you responded to anything in a positive manner. It that’s okay because when i either prove or theories posted here im sure you’ll come to say that even though it was done it can’t be done because you haven’t done it. Or I’ll disprove then and update that aswell i found information I tested it and it was wrong. If your comfortable in your 3 fopt world then that’s fine but generally taking a crap on anything that doesn’t fit inside of it isn’t in the spirit of this forum and it isn’t in the spirit of bodybuilding.
I took the one post down because I felt it was turning catty and that wasn’t my intention with this post. I thought it was interesting information and that others might find it interesting. I’m not here claiming to be a lab technician I found something I want to try and thought I would share it with the community. Tren might have let me get more invested than I would otherwise.
See....why did you have to post something like this? What you said in your PM was a little more respectful and we may have been able to move towards a better path.
You need to re-read what I say and stop taking things so personally. You miss the entire point and ate now desperately trying to paint me as something that I am clearly not. My history speaks and has for many many many years now.
You make statements and present them as fact..... when they are not. Again, wildly inaccurate and incorrect.
If that hurts your feelings, too bad. Be better.
I sent this much earlier before I reached out to you. I took what you said the wrong way I didn’t understand what you were saying instead of responding I reacted. I was in the wrong and I apologize.
Do you want to clarify what you mean by, "Tren might have let me get more invested than I would otherwise". Curious what that means
From a person who doesn't have the same experience as @biguglynewf who has been around the forums since they started and if I thought he was wrong I would state it. We know each other well enough to disagree on something and live with it.
You can put your opinion up that goes against the grain, but don't be upset if everyone doesn't agree with you or states you are wrong. @CoolRick - goes against the grain all the time and does cycles different than most and I find his thought process refreshing. Not what I would do but his ideas are backed by science and work for him.
BUN - calling him negative and doesn't post positive - not accurate, he just calls BS when he sees it and doesn't pull punches, plus he doesn't post a lot. No comments are rude or abusive. If I state something that is inaccurate, I appreciate people who come and state it is wrong or give a different perspective. Doesn't make me dim and I don't take it personally, might foster some conversation or maybe I am just wrong and should admit it so others don't follow what I stated.
I am not part of this conversation, and I do not know you, but I do know BUN and he is a knowledgeable man with a lot of experience in many aspects. You are entitled to your opinion, but if you want to state them as fact - attach some science behind it to prove your theory please.
Why would you ever compare this forum with any other in a negative manner - that is insulting to @Taureau and CB is a great forum that in general is a positive place to learn and guys and girls helping each other. Compared to other forums, this is a well run forum that doesn't put up with abusive/racist/threatening people, albeit Bull/admin will give people every chance to change their ways.
Good on you for your post ending the conversation - simply stating you apologize.
If just means I took some of the things he said more to heart than I probably wouldve if I wasn’t on it