Anyone run small-dose Mast w/ their TRT ?

I have been reading a few medical studies on nandrolone...all on mice though. Very interesting that they all sited increased recovery for injured muscles but (i will have to check) i don't remember the studies ever referencing tendons or ligaments (good or bad).

So @Cheapshot why do you pick the number 200 for primo? I am totally in the boat of "less is more for everything" and "get the most from the least." Do you think you will get benefit from 100mg or 200mg. Many people say you have to run primo at 400-500 to get any benefit and those dosages would not be for me as that would stray too far from TRT (in my ideology).
 
Anyone can feel free to correct me here if I've gone off track -

Early on there were studies that showed (suggested is probably a better word) that both protein and collagen synthesis/turnover was accelerated with nandrolone. This along with the idea that this compound "lubricated" the joints through a few different means and also the anti-inflammatory effect leads to the belief that it's "good for your joints bro".

The problem is that the collagen remodeling that happens works in a few different ways (3 main ones?) At least one of them thickens the tissue but the pattern it reinforces may make them stronger in one way but makes them brittle at the same time. I'm very confident to say this is the case with Winstrol and in the case of the Nans it is this or something quite similar.
I cant remember either but i think winsteol was the only one to act on the 3rd one.. i think it
I have been reading a few medical studies on nandrolone...all on mice though. Very interesting that they all sited increased recovery for injured muscles but (i will have to check) i don't remember the studies ever referencing tendons or ligaments (good or bad).

So @Cheapshot why do you pick the number 200 for primo? I am totally in the boat of "less is more for everything" and "get the most from the least." Do you think you will get benefit from 100mg or 200mg. Many people say you have to run primo at 400-500 to get any benefit and those dosages would not be for me as that would stray too far from TRT (in my ideology).

Its clearly a guess. I always double primo compared to mast.
 
I have been reading a few medical studies on nandrolone...all on mice though. Very interesting that they all sited increased recovery for injured muscles but (i will have to check) i don't remember the studies ever referencing tendons or ligaments (good or bad).

So @Cheapshot why do you pick the number 200 for primo? I am totally in the boat of "less is more for everything" and "get the most from the least." Do you think you will get benefit from 100mg or 200mg. Many people say you have to run primo at 400-500 to get any benefit and those dosages would not be for me as that would stray too far from TRT (in my ideology).

I had put some stuff up on NM but it was real hard to find, I don't recall ever seeing any live human studies referring to this exact question most were on animals or in-vitro
 
Last edited:
Top