That would mean 3-4 times a week in my case. 500 sust/500 deca as my base, 10 weeks, arimidex on hand. I've simply never tried it and am curious. I still would keep it to 4 weeks in total, *maybe* 6 as I'm only using roughly half of the days I'm on cycle.
Lots of experience, not my first rodeo, etc...
Thanks!
(Although I'm tempted to go with Test suspension, 50mg pre-workout. I did that once and it was fantastic. Don't mind frequent jabs.)
EDIT: Or 1-test cyp, 75-100mg pre-workout? Another compound I'm curious about. Going for pure mass BTW. BF% not an issue either way.
Assuming you get a good reaction from SD sure. I've never used it because I believe it's nasty rep regarding sides but that's a personal choice which you are hopefully aware of and happy with so go crazy. On the toxicity side I would def consider taking it
SubQ. EDIT- Sublingually! Not SQ FFS
I have a question about the DHB though, what is your thinking on that one being that it's a fairly long ester relative to this type of use? I'm not seeing how Pre WO is any advantage given that fact. Unless "Pre WO" means the day before what would be special about the timing?
That view of mine is especially compounded by the frequency you are suggesting, you would be using it in pretty much a normal cycle type of way at that point.
I say you can use superdrol as a pre workout pump/strength but you would need to be taking a base that is in your system everyday including non workout days. Remember we grow outside the gym(anabolic) and we break down our muscles training (catabolic).
Need? Nah.
Better with regard to hypertrophy, strength etc? Sure.
Better enough to justify the increased negative aspects? Very much most likely not IMO, this is a very subjective and personal decision of course. As I said above I've never been at a point in my lifting "career" where I've even seriously considered it (ok fine, I have, but not for very long lol)
Semi off topic, no malice intended towards you
@dirtykid1 -
Re: growing outside the gym and breaking down muscles during training.
Don't get me wrong that is a great way to conceptualize what's happening which is why we have been saying it that way since maybe the 50's or the 40's. It's simple and easy to remember, great for getting the point across.
However, a statement like that made in this particular context deserves a bit more clarifying IMO. In this case the definitions of the terms are murky.
I submit that there is not (normally) any "break down" of muscle tissue but rather "irritation" or something like that would be a better term. There is an actual proper term but it escapes me atm. Actual Injury is a different matter.
This irritation causes the body to react and seek to adapt so as to be ready for any further occurrences' of said irritation. These adaptations usually result in the things we seek like hypertrophy and strength. I'm very happy to stick with the simplified "break down" version of that story though, it suits it's purpose well.
So why bother with all this typing?
Because while we do "grow outside the gym", the adaptations, which are often referred to as "the repair process", begin immediately upon enough adaptation forcing stress is placed on the system. IOW we grow "in the gym" too.
To me this supports the appropriate use of any protocol that benefits those processes - having plentiful supply of Anabolic compounds such as AAS, Amino Acids, Carbs, Slin etc on board and available to aid the process among other external things.
TLDR- Properly applied Intermittent only PreWO AAS can be very beneficial while respecting the concept of safe practice.
As always I would truly appreciate any actual scientifically based argument to examine that contradicts anything I say claiming to be fact, I simply have not seen it.
