slanderous claim with no basisMan im trying to find anything other than growthguys because they're getting shady but somehow shady growth guys is better than anything else ive found from groups to suppliers to etc
slanderous claim with no basisMan im trying to find anything other than growthguys because they're getting shady but somehow shady growth guys is better than anything else ive found from groups to suppliers to etc
Are you some kind of idiot. Pay attention when they go out of stock. If the Janoshik test is the same test when they get it back in stock then you think they just pulled more stock out of their ass? Found it in the back? Don't suck off a company that's gone shadyslanderous claim with no basis
I think allot of folks would disagree here, numbers on a box from China don’t dictate the contents are the same in this shipment as they were the last shipmentAlot of the time the Jano Coa is still valid when new stock comes in. Why ? because as long as the new order comes from the same chinese supplier with the same manufacturing Lot or Batch # as the previously ordered Lot or Batch # - they really don't need to test each new batch coming in
Very true my friend - you have a good point @RigPig.I think allot of folks would disagree here, numbers on a box from China don’t dictate the contents are the same in this shipment as they were the last shipment
Distributors on this side are likely dealing in mass quantities, not a kit here or a kit there. It’s worth their while to do the due diligence on every large batch.
Using your train of thought, what’s stopping China from just using the same batch numbers for the rest of time?
In time you will become more jaded. Trust and curiosity is what got you ripped off remember.Very true my friend - you have a good point @RigPig.
However- I would expect that gg has a very good relationship with their supplier - so trust is probably high between the two.
Notwithstanding - after some thought - I completely agree - testing really should be done for each shipment received whether it's the same batch or not.
No shit...ain't that the truth....however in this peptide business I've read one thing that resonated.In time you will become more jaded. Trust and curiosity is what got you ripped off remember.
never had a problem with their product and i’ve used plenty. so maybe i am an idiot for getting exactly what i expect from them every time.Are you some kind of idiot. Pay attention when they go out of stock. If the Janoshik test is the same test when they get it back in stock then you think they just pulled more stock out of their ass? Found it in the back? Don't suck off a company that's gone shady
Good enough that they kept and sold that cloudy batch after customers complained that they received cloudy product. Some of which were not compensated.Very true my friend - you have a good point @RigPig.
However- I would expect that gg has a very good relationship with their supplier - so trust is probably high between the two.
Notwithstanding - after some thought - I completely agree - testing really should be done for each shipment received whether it's the same batch or not.
They also got put on a list for selling bunk bpc-157 which I received.never had a problem with their product and i’ve used plenty. so maybe i am an idiot for getting exactly what i expect from them every time.
Me getting ready to dig through my emails and chat logs with them >Damn. This is cooking. @GGC we summon you NOW. Please and thank you.
Me getting ready to dig through my emails and chat logs with them >![]()
If I remember correctly, no one bought the Cloudtropin until long after it was tested (I know this because I patiently waited). It went cloudy at Jano and GGC was open about it. Then it was sold at a discount after Jano testing showed it was g2g and that basically no one was going grow any antlers off the shit. There is multiple pages on this subject on the SST GGC thread, it was kicked to death over there. I.read.every.f’n.page.Good enough that they kept and sold that cloudy batch after customers complained that they received cloudy product. Some of which were not compensated.
Can you explain what you mean? I think you might be referring to inaccurate inventory counts. For example if a batch order is say, 3000 kits, we may not receive all 3000, or there may be damaged vials, or vials lost in transit to customers, etc. As such we almost never have a 100% accurate inventory count on our website. Just today my web manager emailed me and asked "are you actually out of Tirz 10?" and we have >2500 vials on hand. All the same white top tested batch in circulation. Just a bad inventory count on the website. Easy peasy, we add a few thousand to stock. That'll trigger an item going from "out of stock" to "in stock" despite no new COA.Re using janoshik tests after going out of stock on a batch. You don't just magically get coas with the same batch to restock and even if you did you still get it tested if it came in so much as a different shipment.